RAIHR Framework

The RAIHR Framework

Seven dimensions defining what responsible AI governance in HR requires. Each dimension is a distinct area of judgment — a set of questions to ask, risks to recognize, and actions to take when AI is used in employment decisions.

The framework is not a checklist. It is a structured way of thinking about AI in HR that covers the full scope of where things go wrong — from biased screening tools to covert employee monitoring, from inadequate vendor contracts to organizations that have lost the human capability to govern the tools they depend on.

Dimension 1

Fairness

Identify and challenge AI systems that produce inequitable outcomes across demographic groups in hiring, performance, and development.

Read more →
Dimension 2

Transparency

Ensure that AI-assisted decisions can be meaningfully explained to the candidates and employees they affect — and to the HR professionals who make them.

Read more →
Dimension 3

Privacy

Govern how candidate and employee data is collected, used, retained, and shared by AI vendors — and ensure individuals' rights over their own data are honored.

Read more →
Dimension 4

Security

Protect the sensitive personal data that HR AI systems process, and hold vendors accountable for the security obligations they accept.

Read more →
Dimension 5

Human Oversight

Maintain genuine human judgment in AI-assisted employment decisions — not nominal human presence, but real independent assessment with authority to override.

Read more →
Dimension 6

Accountability

Ensure that every AI-assisted employment decision has a named human owner, a documented audit trail, and a genuine mechanism for challenge and redress.

Read more →
Dimension 7

Sustainability

Manage the long-term risks of AI adoption: capability erosion, vendor dependency, model drift, and governance standards that fall behind evolving practice.

Read more →

The framework is the foundation. The certification is the assessment.

RAIHR Certified Practitioner tests judgment across all seven dimensions through scenario-based examination.